We all know that the vast majority of email is spam or UCE (unsolicited commercial email) and that there are people out there whose sole aim in life is to harvest your email address.
But when you add your email address to a newsletter or service do you consider the security of that list?
If I am visiting a site that requires an email address for access I only ever use a throwaway temporary address from a service like mailinator or guerrillamail. but if it's a site I trust I use my real address.
When signing up for a newsletter etc I consider if the site is trustworthy, are they likely to pass on my address etc, and if they are then I happily hand over my precious email address.
If they weren't trustworthy I'm unlikely to be interested in receiving regular emails from them anyway.
I trust then that the provider will protect my email address and ensure that it stays in safe hands.
Some sites, especially the popular ones with large mailing lists, chose to use a third party service to despatch all their emails. Of course they have carefully selected the provider for the quality of their service and trustworthyness (is that even a word?).
This is where the problem lies
Hacking one server that might hold a few thousand email addresses is interesting but hacking an email list processor's server that might contain millions of email addresses is both profitable and far more efficient.
OOps they did it again
What does that mean to you
Your preciously guarded email address "might" now be in the hands of the spam farms. Sure your anti-spam software/service might do an excellent job but some will still get through. And if you are really unlucky you might receive so much spam email that your email address is rendered useless.
Then if that account is ever compromised, and it will be easy to tell as no one other than videoreviewscom should be sending you anything at that address, you simply forward all emails to that address to the great trash can of the internet "dev null".